pages 100 to 101
- These were groups of people bound by kinship ties .
- Kinship ties means relations based on blood or marriage .
- In the Rigveda, about thirty janas are mentioned.
What is panchajana?
- Five of the thirty janas were collectively known as the panchajana .
| The five janas of the panchajana |
|---|
| Yadu |
| Turvasha |
| Puru |
| Anu |
| Druhyu |
LET'S RECALL: What does the name "Bharata" tell us?
- In previous grades, you have read that the name 'Bharata' first appears in the Rigveda. It is used in reference to the 'Bharata jana', or the people who were ruled by the family of the Bharatas. What does this tell us about how early communities identified themselves and their rulers?
Show Answer
- The expression “Bharata jana” links the people with the family that ruled them.
- This fits the chapter's description of early Vedic society as organised through kinship-based janas , before territorial identity became more important in the age of the janapadas.
What was the role of the raja during this period?
- During this period, the raja functioned primarily as a clan chief .
- He led the group in warfare and ensured the protection of its members .
- At this stage, the textbook presents the raja primarily as a clan chief . Later sections show political identity becoming increasingly territorial with the rise of janapadas.
- Vidhata was a popular gathering , attended by members of the community ( janas ) .
- It functioned as a forum for discussions on warfare and other political matters .
- It was attended by members of the community (janas) , making it a popular gathering.
What is the difference between sabha, samiti and vidhata?
- There were 3 assemblies during this period.
| Assembly | Size | Function | Who attended |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sabha | Smaller body | Primarily served a judicial function | Composed of select elites |
| Samiti | Larger assembly | Focused on policy decisions and political affairs | Represented the broader population |
| Vidhata | Popular gathering | Forum for discussions on warfare and other political matters | Attended by members of the community ( janas ) |
- Remember: sabha = mainly judicial; samiti = policy and political affairs; vidhata = a popular gathering for warfare and other political matters.
How do sabha, samiti and vidhata compare with organisations today?
- In modern democracies, heads of government exercise power but are bound by constitutions and parliaments, which function as representative bodies that check the powers of elected leaders. Do the roles of the raja and the assemblies in Vedic times suggest a similar principle? Can we say that systems of governance in Indian history, since their early institutionalised forms, were guided by the idea of ensuring people's participation in the political process?
Show Answer
- The raja did not function in isolation : the sabha had a judicial role, the samiti dealt with policy and political affairs, and the vidhata was a popular forum for warfare and other political matters.
- Because important functions were handled through collective assemblies, the passage suggests an early principle of participation in political processes .
- A broad modern comparison can be made with courts and representative legislatures , which also place important public functions in institutions rather than in one individual. The ancient assemblies, however, were not the same as modern democratic institutions .
- Jana = clan, groups bound by kinship ties (relations based on blood or marriage). The Rigveda names about thirty, including the Bharata jana.
- Panchajana = the five janas named together: Yadu, Turvasha, Puru, Anu, Druhyu.
- "Bharata" first appears here in the expression "Bharata jana" , referring to people ruled by the Bharata family.
- The raja, in this period, was primarily a clan chief: he led in war and protected his people.
- Three assemblies: sabha (small, judicial), samiti (larger, policy), vidhata (popular, war and politics).
- The assemblies carried judicial, policy and political functions alongside the raja and show an early form of participation in political processes.