How can we say that the vadai packet incident reveals that the writer lacked the cognitive and emotional maturity required to understand the implications of untouchability?
Answer:
The vadai packet incident does not prove that the writer lacked cognitive and emotional maturity. The incident shows the writer's anger and frustration about the caste system and how it affects their life. But it also shows how untouchability can change how a person sees themselves and others, especially when they are young. The writer may not fully understand untouchability, but that does not mean they are not mature in thinking or feeling.
Step-by-step explanation by Teachoo:
- First, we need to state our main argument, which is that there is no clear evidence that the writer lacked cognitive and emotional maturity. 👊
- Next, we need to explain what the vadai packet incident reveals about the writer's emotions and thoughts. 😡
- Then, we need to show how the vadai packet incident can also be interpreted as an example of how untouchability can affect a person's perception of themselves and others. 👀
Finally, we need to acknowledge that the writer may not fully understand the implications of untouchability, but this does not necessarily mean they lack cognitive or emotional maturity. Implications mean the possible consequences or effects of something. We can use words such as "may not", "fully", and "but".
