Slide49.JPG

Slide50.JPG
Ex 3.2.jpg
Ex 3.2. - imge.jpg


Transcript

Ex 3.2, 14 Show that (i) [■8(5&−1@6&7)] [■8(2&1@3&4)] ≠ [■8(2&1@3&4)] [■8(5&−1@6&7)] Solving L.H.S [■8(5&−1@6&7)]_(2 × 2) [■8(2&1@3&4)]_(2 × 2) = [■8(5 × 2+(−1) × 3&5 × 1+(−1)× 4@6 × 2+7 × 3&6 × 1+7 × 4)]_(2 × 2) = [■8(10−3&5−4@12+21&6+28) ] = [■8(𝟕&𝟏@𝟑𝟑&𝟑𝟒)] Solving R.H.S [■8(2&1@3&4)]_(2 × 2) [■8(5&−1@6&7)]_(2 × 2) = [■8(2 × 5+1 × 6&2 × (−1)+1 × 7@3 × 5+4 × 6&3 × (−1)+4 × 7)]_(2 × 2) = [■8(10+6&−2+7@15+24&−3+28)] = [■8(𝟏𝟔&𝟓@𝟑𝟗&𝟐𝟓)] ≠ L.H.S Thus, L.H.S. ≠ R.H.S. Hence proved. Ex 3.2, 14 Show that (ii) [■8(1&2&3@0&1&0@1&1&0)][■8(−1&1&0@0&−1&1@2&3&4)] ≠[■8(−1&1&0@0&−1&1@2&3&4)][■8(1&2&3@0&1&0@1&1&0)] Solving L.H.S. [■8(1&2&3@0&1&0@1&1&0)]_(3 × 3) [■8(−1&1&0@0&−1&1@2&3&4)]_(3 × 3) = [■8(1×(⤶7−1)+2×0+3×2&1×1+2×(−1)+3×3&1×0+2×1+3×4@0×(⤶7−1)+1×0+0×2&0×1+1×(⤶7−1)+0×3&0×0+1×1+0×4@1×(⤶7−1)+1×0+0×2&1×1+1×(⤶7−1)+0×3&1×0+1×1+0×4)]_(3×3) = [■8(−1+0+6&1−2+9&0+2+12@0+0+0&0−1+0&0+1+0@−1+0+0&1−1+0&0+1+0)] = [■8(𝟓&𝟖&𝟏𝟒@𝟎&−𝟏&𝟏@−𝟏&𝟎&𝟏)] Solving R.H.S [■8(−1&1&0@0&−1&1@2&3&4)]_(3 × 3) [■8(1&2&3@0&1&0@1&1&0)]_(3 × 3) = [■8(−1×1+1×0+0×1&−1×2+1×1+0×1&−1×3+1×0+0×0@0×1+(−1)×0+1×1&0×2+(⤶7−1)×1+1×1&0×3+(−1)×0+1×0@2×1+(3)×0+4×1&2×2+3×1+4×1&2×3+(3)×0+4×0)]_(3×3) = [■8(−1+0+0&−2+1+0&−3+0+0@0+0+1&0−1+1&0+0+0@2+0+4&4+3+4&6+0+0)] = [■8(−𝟏&−𝟏&−𝟑@𝟏&𝟎&𝟎@𝟔&𝟏𝟏&𝟔)] ≠ L.H.S ∴ L.H.S. ≠ R.H.S Hence proved

Ask a doubt
Davneet Singh's photo - Co-founder, Teachoo

Made by

Davneet Singh

Davneet Singh has done his B.Tech from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. He has been teaching from the past 14 years. He provides courses for Maths, Science, Social Science, Physics, Chemistry, Computer Science at Teachoo.