(i) Why were the type ‘B’ cuttings able to grow as sugarcane but type ‘A’ could not?
(ii) What difference was present in type ‘B’ compared to type ‘A’?
(iii) What observation or measurement was made to determine whether this change had an effect?
(iv) What parameters should be kept the same for both types of cuttings to ensure a fair comparison?
View Answer
(i) Type B grew because its cutting included a node with an intercalary or apical meristem, which can divide and form new shoots; type A had no such growing region.
(ii) Type B contained a node (with buds and meristematic tissue), while type A was a piece of internode without one.
(iii) The observation was that type B sprouted and grew into sugarcane plants while type A did not.
(iv) Soil, water, light, temperature and the size of the cuttings should be kept the same, so only the presence of a node differs.